EMAIL LETTER FROM UNITY PARTY OF WA

From: Unity WA [mailto:unitywa@westnet.com.au]
Sent: Thursday, 12 January 2012 3:21 PM
To: 'minister.porter'
Cc: 'associate.justice.murray'; President - Court of Appeal WA (courtofappeal.office@justice.wa.gov.au); Chairperson - Law reform Comm (lrcwa@justice.wa.gov.au); President - LPBWA (lpcc@lpbwa.com); President - PICCC (piccc@piccc.wa.gov.au); President - CCCWA; President - High Court; Fed. Attorney General; Chairperson
Subject: FW: MY LETTER TO THE ASSOCIATE OF JUSTICE MURRAY: CIV 1689 OF 2011: PRINCIPAL REGISTRAR V CHIN [2012] WASC 7

Mr. Christian Porter

WA Attorney General

minister.porter@dpc.wa.gov.au

Dear Attorney General,

We refer to our Member Mr. Nicholas Chin’s email below and would like your comment before we upload onto our websites for public information as you haven been ignoring our emails before.

We look forward to hearing from you soon?

Yours respectfully,

Eddie Hwang

President

Unity Party WA

unitywa@westnet.com.au

http://twitter.com/unitypartywa

http://unitypartywa.blogspot.com/

www.unitywa.org

Phone/Fax: 61893681884

Date: 12-Jan-2012.

Environmental Friendly - Save the Trees/use email.

From: Nicholas N Chin <nnchin1@gmail.com>
Date: 11 January 2012 9:20:22 PM AWST
To: "associate.justice.murray" <Associate.Justice.Murray@justice.wa.gov.au>,  "minister.porter" <Minister.Porter@dpc.wa.gov.au>, unitywa@westnet.com.au
Subject: MY LETTER TO THE ASSOCIATE OF JUSTICE MURRAY: CIV 1689 OF 2011: PRINCIPAL REGISTRAR V CHIN [2012] WASC 7

The Associate to His Honour Justice Murray

Supreme Court of WA

The Attorney General of Western Australia 

The Honourable Christian Porter MLA

The President of the Unity Party WA 

Mr. Eddie Hwang 

Dear Sirs

I refer to the above matter. I expressed my deep felt thanks for HIs Honour Justice Murray for his  meticulous efforts in the writing of the fine judgement which is near perfect.  I understand that it is very difficult for His Honour to please everyone. 

Please find my attached letter dated 11th January, 2012 in three pages faxed to the various interested parties.  

I am aggrieved by the costs order made against me.  

I am working in the public interests and therefore the discretion to impose costs order against me by His Honour should be exercised within the four corners of the law, although it is the accepted principle of law that the prevailing party should be entitled to costs subject to exceptions.     

I would appreciate if His Honour would look into the issue of the costs order again. 

Thank you very much. 

Yours faithfully

NICHOLAS N CHIN 

387, ALEXANDER DRIVE

DIANELLA WA 6059 

Phone: 08 92757440 

Mobile: 0421642735

Email: nnchin1@gmail.com

Judicial Corruption in Australia

You have to laugh at the boldness and hypocrisy with which Corrupt Public Servants are displaying on the High Courts website, a copy of a speech made by former Judge Michael Kirby entitled:
LIVING ETHICS TACKLING JUDICIAL CORRUPTION GLOBALLY
The speech makes a good reading in which Michael Kirby gave details of the Ethical conduct with which a Judge should act and which can be found in the UN Convention against Corruption to which Australia is a party to.   From the corrupt conduct of may Judges like William GUMMOW of the High Court of Australia, Peter GRAHAM and Margaret STONE of the Federal Court, is is clear that Corrupt Judges lack ethical conduct when making Judgements and Orders to protect Corrupt Public Servants, Lawyers and Judges.
The Evidence against Corrupt Judges, Public Servants and Lawyers is over well-ming and to prevent that the Evidence be made Public, Corrupt Judges like Margaret Stone of the Federal Court of Australia make allegations of Abuse of Process, that Documents are scandalous or vexatious to Protect and Cover Up the corrupt conduct of Judges, Public Servants and to conceal forgery and criminal activity Lawyers like John Patrick Meehan.
The Evidence that Corrupt Judges have no Ethics and are perverting and obstructing justice and are violating Human Rights and abusing the law in Australia for their own gains, is in the Public view and Corrupt Politicians that are protecting corrupt Judges, Public Servants and Lawyers would be Judged accordingly, that is a fact.
http://corruptionexposed.info/?cat=4
Editor: Pedro Alfaro

Is there really a Separation of Power?

http://www.ozexposed.com/

This is a brilliant display of many things and MANY questions need to be asked by Australians!....

Did the Judge really listen to the case or was the verdict already decided and written before the case even started being presented?

The Judiciary and Polititions socially engineer us to "think" there is a separation of powers. After you read this you have to ask; Is the High Court there to adudicate as per the 'RULE OF LAW' or 'UPHOLD THE SYSTEM' no matter what?

Could it be that we have some 'BAD APPLES' on the high court bench?