THE LETTER OF DEMAND FOR DR KS CHAN THAT CAUSED THE COMPLAINT OF PINO MONACO BEING EFFECTED THROUGH THE BACK DOOR OF THE REGULATOR
posted by Nicholas N Chin @ 2:21 AM
Nicholas N Chin v Legal Practice Board of WA
Courts not to avoid the litigation of three issues so that justice is seen to be done: 1) Pseudo Board 2) Pillaging by solicitor with a zero sum false debt claim. 3) Recognition of the falsification of court records This Gordian Knot will free me for independent law practice again
Saturday, January 12, 2013
Nicholas N Chin v Legal Practice Board of WA
Courts not to avoid the litigation of three issues so that justice is seen to be done: 1) Pseudo Board 2) Pillaging by solicitor with a zero sum false debt claim. 3) Recognition of the falsification of court records This Gordian Knot will free me for independent law practice again
Contributors
Previous Posts
- NON-LAWYER APPOINTED NEW LORD CHANCELLOR IN UK
- WHY AN HONEST LAWYER CANNOT DEFEND HIS HONEST CLIE...
- lawyerocracy
- LAWYERS WILL FAIL YOU: Former Federal Attorney Gen...
- COMPENSATION BY THE AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT
- CURRENT AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT HAS NO LEGAL BASIS B...
- THE REGULATOR IS INTIMATING ME THAT I MIGHT HAVE B...
- APPLICATION - SPECIAL LEAVE - HIGH COURT OF AUSTRA...
- RESPONSE LETTER TO LPCC DATED 15.3.2010
- MINUTE -AMENDED GROUNDS OF APPEAL - CACV 105 OF 2008
Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home