HIGH COURT DECISION IN P36 OF 2009 DID NOT LITIGATE THE ISSUE OF PSEUDO BOARD - CREDIBILITY OF JUSTICE CHANEY ...
________________________________________
From: Matthew Grey [mailto:mgrey@hcourt.gov.au]
Sent: Tuesday, 23 March 2010 5:59 AM
To: Nicholas N Chin
Subject: RE: Your application for special leave to appeal in matter number P36/2009
Dear Mr Chin
I have nothing further to add.
Regards
Matt Grey
Deputy Registrar
23/3/10
From: "Nicholas N Chin"
To: "'Matthew Grey'"
Cc:
Date: 22/03/2010 09:53 PM
Subject: RE: Your application for special leave to appeal in matter number P36/2009
________________________________________
Dear Mr Grey
The High Court decision to dismiss my Application for Special Leave to Appeal hinges on the credibility of the learned Justice Chaney of the State Administrative Tribunal of Western Australia in VR 107 of 208 delivered on 25.10.2008. However, Justice Chaney was then reasonably found to have been actively involved in re-persecuting me on the same issues and facts in VR87 of 2008 for the further remedy of Professional Misconduct which the Legal Profession Complaints Committee did not do on the last occasion.
My letter of the 15th day of March, 2009 to SAT which has been posted to you since the 18.3.2010 explains why the principle of the rule of law already accepted by the High Court of Australia does not permit this matter to be re-litigated on the ground of res judicata and yet this is happening. Under these circumstances, do you still say that I do not have a chance for review?
Yours faithfully
NICHOLAS N CHIN
________________________________________
From: Matthew Grey [mailto:mgrey@hcourt.gov.au]
Sent: Monday, 22 March 2010 9:50 AM
To: nnchin09@tpg.com.au
Subject: Your application for special leave to appeal in matter number P36/2009
Dear Mr Chin
I refer to your letter to Ms Cheetham dated 18/3/10.
I advise that the decision of the High Court in dismissing your application for special leave to appeal was final. There is therefore no right of review of that decision.
Regards
Matt Grey
Deputy Registrar
22/3/10
posted by Nicholas N Chin @ 10:53 PM
2 Comments:
If you expect justice at the fountain of justice but if it is not there. It is disappointing... only the good Lord knows what is best for me. Help me Lord. Let me not be tortured because justice is only available form the Lord's justice. Man do not give justice or gives imperfect justice.
"You do not have to look into your books, nor do you require 20/20 vision, to recognise the twin hallmarks of a tyranny: a subservient press and a subservient judiciary.
"It is very rare in history to find examples of a society which enjoyed an independent, free press, but was marred by a subservient judiciary, or where an independent judiciary flourished alongside a subservient press."
Quote by Lord Justice Igor Judge
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home