THE REGULATOR IS INTIMATING ME THAT I MIGHT HAVE BREACHED MY UNDERTAKING WHEN I AM SURE I DID NOT.
posted by Nicholas N Chin @ 4:48 AM
0 Comments
Nicholas N Chin v Legal Practice Board of WA
Courts not to avoid the litigation of three issues so that justice is seen to be done: 1) Pseudo Board 2) Pillaging by solicitor with a zero sum false debt claim. 3) Recognition of the falsification of court records This Gordian Knot will free me for independent law practice again
Thursday, July 19, 2012
Nicholas N Chin v Legal Practice Board of WA
Courts not to avoid the litigation of three issues so that justice is seen to be done: 1) Pseudo Board 2) Pillaging by solicitor with a zero sum false debt claim. 3) Recognition of the falsification of court records This Gordian Knot will free me for independent law practice again
Contributors
Previous Posts
- EFFECTIVELY LAWYERING REQUIRES YOU TO USE THE CORR...
- CHIN V THIES: WHY REGISTRAR SUE WILDE OF THE FREMA...
- CASE OF A BIPOLAR LAWYER
- A last-ditch argument: LESS THAN CANDOUR SOLICITOR...
- CALIFORNIA TO APOLOGIZE FOR CHINESE BIGOTRY AND SE...
- LAWYER BROKE PUBLIC TRUST
- DR JOHN WILSON: NO MORE MUCKING AROUND
- KIRBY J IS PROVIDING YOU TOOLS TO FIGHT JUDICIAL C...
- Bveb b w
- THE LETTER OF DEMAND FOR DR KS CHAN THAT CAUSED TH...
Archives
- January 2010
- July 2010
- August 2010
- September 2010
- October 2010
- January 2011
- February 2011
- March 2011
- November 2011
- January 2012
- February 2012
- March 2012
- July 2012
- September 2012
- October 2012
- January 2013
- June 2013
- January 2014
- May 2014
- June 2015
Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]